#Converting quarkxpress 8.5 to indesign mac

Still, IвЂ™m the first to admit that InDesignвЂ™s recommended system requirementsВ–the list includes a G3 processor, OS 8.5 or later, and 128MB of RAMВ–are excessive. With long documentsВ–on G3 or better machines. I canвЂ™t vouch for the experience of others, but my personal experience with InDesign is that it runs relatively briskly В– WhatвЂ™s more, InDesignвЂ™s hard-core typography algorithms can require a lot of processing power, causing slower performance on older machines. For instance, thereвЂ™s no way to justify text vertically inside a text frame (an easy task in QuarkXPress). InDesignвЂ™s text handling isnвЂ™t all rosy, however. ItвЂ™s not that you canвЂ™t create most of these effects by hand in XPress itвЂ™s just that InDesign makes it easy.

#Converting quarkxpress 8.5 to indesign mac

Factor in the ability to insert вЂњhiddenвЂќ charactersВ–frequently available in fonts but not accessible through the normal Mac keyboardВ–and support for the new OpenType fonts, and you have an extraordinary opportunity to set great type with less effort. (For in-depth information about this topic, see вЂњвЂќSetting Type in InDesignвЂќ,вЂќ Lines to get better-looking justified type) are very impressive. Features such as optical kerning (which better calculates optimal character spacing) and Multi-line Composer (which calculates line breaks across ThereвЂ™s no doubt that InDesignвЂ™s greatest strength is in its typesetting.

Here they weigh in (and often disagree) about how Adobe InDesign 1.0 ( ) and QuarkXPress 4.0 ( ) compare, and give their opinions about the claims flying around design-firm watercoolers and prepress houses everywhere. So we invited two of MacworldвЂ™s most trusted experts вЂ“QuarkXPress guru David Blatner, author of The QuarkXPress 4 Book and coauthor of Real World Photoshop 5 (both Peachpit Press, 1998), and Contributing Editor Deke McClelland, author of Adobe InDesign for Dummies and Photoshop 5 Bible, Gold Edition (both IDG Books Worldwide, 1999)вЂ“to have their say. And everyone has an opinion about whether QuarkXPress or Adobe InDesign will win. With the release of Adobe InDesign 1.0, everyone is talking about desktop publishing. Just in time for the year 2000, the game is afoot again. Every release brought new possibilities so fundamental that now we take them for granted: kerning, automatic hyphenation, style sheets, automatic drop caps, color separationвЂ“heck, even Oh, the exciting feature wars we had back then. Go Beyond the Hype with Publishing Gurus Deke McClelland and David BlatnerДesktop Publishing just hasnвЂ™t been the same since the early 1990s, when Aldus PageMaker and QuarkXPress stopped duking it out and Quark began its reign supreme.